Adam Schefter reported yesterday that the Seahawks have interest in bringing Gus Bradley back to Seattle. Bradley, as you may recall, was the Seahawks defensive coordinator from 2009 through 2012. Yes, he predates Pete Carroll and stands as the one good thing Jim Mora Jr. did for this franchise. He went on to become the head coach of the Jacksonville Jaguars for four seasons and then the defensive coordinator for the Los Angeles Chargers. He signed a one-year deal with the Chargers, and is now a hot commodity on the coaching market. Why would someone with a good shot at a head coaching position be interested in returning to his old Seahawks stomping grounds when Pete Carroll is entrenched in the top spot? Good question. Let’s discuss.

First, let’s look at what Bradley has done in his NFL career. His first two seasons as defensive coordinator in Seattle were not exactly resume builders. The Seahawks finished 24th in points allows and 26th in yards allowed in 2009 and then 27th in both categories the following season, which was his first under Carroll. Both of those defenses were severely lacking in talent. Kelly Jennings was still around, as were starters like Kentwan Balmer, and aging Lofa Tatupu, David Hawthorne, and Marcus Trufant. Things turned in 2011 once the full Legion of Boom took the field. Bradley was part of the leadership that assembled and utilized the unique talents that formed that secondary. Many people thought they were crazy for having 6’4″ and 6’3″ corners in Brandon Browner and Richard Sherman. It seems obvious now, but it was a grand experiment back then and Bradley was the one responsible for that defense, even if Carroll was there behind the scenes.

That 2011 defense finished the season ranked 7th in points allowed and 9th in yards allowed. It was the first time a Seahawks had a defense finish in the top ten in both categories since Cortez Kennedy won Defensive Player of the Year in 1991. They got even better the following season when they ranked 1st in points allowed and 4th in yards allowed. No Seahawks defense had ever led the league in points allowed.

At least some folks will point out that 2012 Seahawks defense had some problems closing out games, including the divisional playoff loss in Atlanta. Those same people are unlikely to point out the inferior pass rush Bradley dealt with during his tenure. Chris Clemons was pretty much the only threat, and when he was injured in the playoff win over Washington, the only remaining option was undersized rookie Bruce Irvin against the Falcons.

Carroll made pass rush the top offseason priority after that loss, which led to adding guys like Cliff Avril and Michael Bennett. Bradley never got to coach that defense as he had moved on to Jacksonville.

I remember meeting Bradley and talking to him a few times after our first meeting. He is remarkably engaging, friendly, and energetic. Nobody I have met in football comes close to matching Carroll’s boundless positive energy than Bradley. Monte Kiffin, the famed Tampa Bay defensive mastermind, once said this about Bradley to Mora:

 

“[Jim], listen to me. I have got a guy here in Tampa that is one of, if not, the finest football coaches I have ever worked with. He’s an A-plus. He’s a once-in-a-lifetime coach. You need to talk to him”

 

Carroll had no intention of keeping anyone from Mora’s staff, but Bradley wowed him so much that he won the job, while teaming with Dan Quinn to form one of the most talented defensive coaching rooms the NFL has seen in the last 20 years.

Bradley did not fare so well in Jacksonville, but a significant portion of that blame has to land on the general manager for the talent Bradley was given. Jaguars defenses finished 27th, 26th, and 24th in his first three seasons as coach. That turned in Bradley’s final season when they finished 6th. One has to wonder if Bradley would have replicated new coach Doug Marrone’s success this season if he had the benefit of Calais Campbell, A.J. Bouye, and Leonard Fournette. Keep in mind, Todd Wash, the Jaguars defensive coordinator this year was a Bradley hire.

Bradley was highly sought after despite his dismal record in Jacksonville and landed with the Chargers where he oversaw a major turnaround on defense. Los Angeles finished ranked 3rd in points allowed, the highest a Chargers defense has finished since 1979. Notice a pattern?

My assumption was that he would parlay that success into a new head coaching gig, either in the NFL or in college. He’d be an unreal program builder in college. It had not really occurred to me that he might consider returning to Seattle, both because it would seem like a step back in time and because it would be a lateral move. Then, it clicked after hearing Schefter’s report.

I have been hearing rumblings since the season ended that the Seahawks do not plan to bring back Kris Richard. I also believe, but have not been told, that Tom Cable could also be on his way out. If I was in Carroll and Schneider’s shoes, and wanted to attract back a top coaching talent like Bradley, I would figure out a way to paint this as a compelling step forward in his career.

The story would go something like this, “Come back and take over a defense you know well with a variety of players you know well. Help us rebuild with a new young core. We will make you the assistant head coach and the clear second-in-command on the coaching staff. Pete may either retire or move into a different role in the organization in a few years. You would be in great position to take over should that happen, and you know Pete will help you get another head coaching gig before then if you get the itch.”

Fine, but he could possibly get another head coaching job now. Why wait? Bradley saw how hard it is to win without a good general manager and without a good quarterback. Seattle already has both, and they should be around for the next decade. It also has the best owner in the league. Having those pieces in place make a massive difference in a head coaches success and the perception of him around the league.

Look at Bill Belichick. He was an under .500 coach in Cleveland before joining up with Tom Brady and Robert Kraft in New England. He is in the conversation for the best coach in history, but I have doubts about whether that would be the case if he wound up elsewhere or with a different quarterback.

People often wrongly assume that the only way forward in a career is escalating responsibilities and titles. Some people are blinded by that. Wiser folks pay attention to what leads to success and happiness and chase those instead. This is a situation where Bradley could have gained some of this wisdom through his first head coaching experience that will set him up for a far more successful and rewarding second stint.

Just the fact that Seattle appears to be pursuing him is a strong signal that Carroll and Schneider do not appear interested in standing still. Richard would appear to be the safest of the people on the coaching staff. Not only has the defense been a better part of the team the past two seasons, but Richard has been with Carroll since USC. He even played for Carroll. Sending him packing means nobody is safe on that staff.

I could see a few different ways this could break if Bradley were to get hired. Perhaps most likely, Bradley would replace Cable as assistant head coach and run the defense. Cable would be let go. The team has kept two assistant head coaches before, but I think they would want to put Bradley in a stronger position. Removing Cable would also allow the team to consolidate offensive responsibilities under Darrell Bevell. Cable has been the line coach and the run game coordinator and outranked Bevell on the staff. That has made for a challenging dynamic at times.

It would not surprise me to see the team decide to give Bevell an opportunity to fully control the offense. That would also provide some stability on the staff. I would like to see them move on from Bevell as well for reasons I have previously outlined, but I would understand the logic of how things could change without Cable in the picture.

This is just the start of what should be an eventful and pivotal offseason.

 

7 Responses

  1. Kurt Z

    Speaking of the coaching tree – both of Carroll’s teams, Jax is straight up a Carroll-style club, even without Bradley, and Atlanta are still in the dance.

    To me, it is amazing how the meme that you have to have a big tall white guy to play QB is still alive and well. Bet their are a whole bunch of old school NFL dudes going,…. see I told you, Blake Bortles could win you a playoff,… he ALWAYS looked like a winner, a real gamer.

    So the Bortles/Jake Lockers of the world get like a dozen or so chances after they prove that they are coach/team killers – turnover machines, basically playing the wrong position. (Locker was an All-State safety in HS)

    Then a Tyrod Taylor is on thin ice all the time, even though he takes care of the ball and does all the things the coaches tell him to do.

    That douchebag in Buffalo can’t wait to get a Nathan Peterman in there to make some plays.

    Oh he makes plays,, a game-ending pick! In under thirty seconds.

    You watch. After TT is out of league, because of injury, Peterman will be on someone’s bench for a dozen years or so, and get a nice pension, for throwing a great practice ball and because, all those ‘head coaches, they feel really comfortable with him in the film room.

    Nathan is the next Clipboard Jesus, best football nickname of all time.

    Reply
  2. Uncle Bob

    I guess this piece explains why I enjoy this blog as much as I do. Though I didn’t have Bradley in mind, I’ve been thinking for the past week or so that one of the younger, up and coming, offensive studs (or some seasoned defensive heavies e.g. Fangio et al) might get that “head coach in waiting offer”. I was suspicious that the “we’re holding pat on the coaches we have…..” statement might have been more news flow control than absolute reality. This view stated above and the beginnings of rumbles about Cable and Richard elsewhere popping up in the past 24 or so hours fits the vision better. I’m glad others share my disdain for the “two headed monster” PC created for controlling the offense, poor management decision no matter how well intentioned. If Bevell did survive the supposed review of all coaches that’s going on in the front office, perhaps he could prevail once having full autonomy, or, likely bury himself as many would suspect. As for Cable, as many have said, it’s well past time he find a new environment to work within. There are plenty of examples of questionable coaching on his part, but one stat I’ve seen recently, if accurate, shocks the most. This team had 0 (as in zero, zip, nada) yards gained by a running back inside the 10 yard line for the ENTIRE season. Sheeeesh!!

    This might turn out to be a fun off season after all…….at least for speculating for next season. If the shake ups ripple legitimately through both coaches and players, we might remain competitive next season after all.

    Reply
  3. michael mccathy

    It s hard to envisage a future, regardless of Bradley

    When you have a coach who bases his skills on relationships, and letting players have a long leash or no leash at all, the Seahawks drafted well for 2 years and had a run, but it should have been a 5 year run. And now, will Carroll make the hard choices to start over? Will Schneider. Categorically, no. Neither is ruthless and uncaring like Belachick. It took me a long time to understand Belachick, but the dude must have spent 2 or 3 years in big poker tournaments, because he hides his eyes under his hoodie, and mumbles sweet nothings in order not to give away a tell. The only thing missing is the sunglasses. But his style suits the way the NFL is structured.

    Reply
  4. Hawkman

    Was just telling my nephew last week I hope they somehow bring Bradley back ! That would be GREAT ! Especially if they send Cable packing , which I feel is a real need on this team. He has had an enormous input on the O-line drafting and FA’s and along with His coaching ( they say he is good but I don’t see it ) it has just run its course . It is just time for a new face with new views on Player acquisition and blocking style, (it’s all about the footwork !!!!)

    Reply
    • Uncle Bob

      Your comment about “footwork” triggers another observation from this season. There were some decent run plays (I know, hard to believe). I noticed on some of them the line was using power blocking techniques (getting off the snap) rather than rolling back on their heals (so to speak). In general, these guys don’t have the power for ZBS from my perspective. Fant supposedly worked last off season to bulk up which is wise/good for his return if he has maintained. He also got to work with Walter Jones on technique…….wish we could have seen the results of that. Pocic, if physiologically capable, should follow a similar strength program, he already has decent technique (which good coaching could still help improve). Brown can get bye on veteran gile, and hopefully a full preseason program will ensure he is well tuned (if age isn’t a consideration yet). Britt has some growing to do still, but the instability hasn’t helped him much. After that we’ll have to see who stays or gets on board.

      Reply
      • Hawkman

        If Fant is healthy ,him and Pocic could battle out for the RT spot, Pocic is much better suited to play tackle then Guard. Britt remains at Center with a ( hope his ankle heals up ) healthy Brown at LT. I believe they must get one stud Guard in FA. Then draft a couple of highly rated Guards and if they must let Ifedi fight it out with them to see who starts at the other Guard position ( shouldn’t be Ifedi ).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

", source:"wp" });