The Morning After: Trader Schneider Goes Supernova in Draft Day 2
Addressed Needs
Good Value
Potential for Impact
4.6Day 2 Draft Rating
Reader Rating: (21 Votes)

We winced when looking at the Seahawks four total selections entering the 2019 NFL Draft. We joked about the certainty of John Schneider trading back to acquire additional selections. We knew that what he did with the 21st pick would have a significant impact on the near-future of this franchise. One day after criticizing the underwhelming return of two fourth round picks to trade back from 21 to 30 in the first round, I must bow at the feet of the master. Schneider took that 21st pick in the first round and turned it into two second round picks, two fourth round picks, and a fifth. That is not quite water into wine, but Schneider has proven draft deity once again.

Schneider trade tree showing how he turned the 21st pick into Marquise Blair, D.K. Metcalf, and three additional picks for day three in the draft

Marquise Blair – Safety

Seattle has used two of those five picks so far on safety Marquise Blair and wide receiver D.K. Metcalf. I have been pretty consistent in stating the positions where the Seahawks roster priorities seemed to be. They needed pass rush on the defensive line, help at safety, and a top-end receiver.

It appears the front office had a similar read. I shared my thoughts on L.J. Collier in yesterday’s column. Blair plays like a strong safety, with a reputation for ferocious hitting and physical play that belies his 185 pound frame. Jim Nagy, a former Seahawks scout who now runs the Senior Bowl, was so ecstatic about the pick he took to Twitter to share that Blair screamed “Seahawks safety” the moment he watched film of him.

Blair has been ejected from multiple college games for targeting. Those would be personal foul penalties in the NFL. Kam Chancellor knows a thing or two about how to deliver a blow within the framework of the rule book and should be around to pass along some wisdom. The Seahawks coaching staff has also proven they can coach proper physical tackling.

Blair was considered by some to be a cornerback prospect. Carroll said he will start as a strong safety, but could “do some special things,” matching up in coverage. Knowing there is even the potential for him to be in the mix as slot corner adds more value to the pick.

The concern here is whether his body will allow him to play the same intimidating style in the NFL. He may need to add 10-15 pounds in order to stay healthy. He does have a history of knee issues, including some ligament repair in high school and college. Blair becomes the highest drafted safety (47th pick, Round 2) for Schneider since Earl Thomas was chosen in the first round in 2010.

One could argue that they really see a high ceiling for Blair and fans should be excited. The cynical argument would be that their two safety selections in round three of the 2016 draft, Delano Hill and Tedric Thompson, have yet to distinguish themselves. Look for some three safety personnel groupings that could mix and match two of Hill, Thompson, and Blair with certain starter Bradley McDougald.

D.K. Metcalf – Wide Receiver

Metcalf is certain to be the player creating the most buzz among Seahawks fans. The dude is a physical freak of nature who was the talk of the NFL Combine when at 6’3″ and 228 pounds, he ran a 4.33 40-yard dash, did 27 reps of 225 lbs on the bench press, had a 40.5″ vertical jump, and a 134″ broad jump.

Many expected those eye-popping athletic numbers would vault Metcalf into the first round. What likely kept him from going that high were the poor agility results in the 20 yard shuttle and 3-cone drills. The implication is that Metcalf is a one-trick pony who can run in a straight line really fast, but will struggle to unlock top-shelf production without accessing other parts of the route tree that require more lateral agility.

Seattle was more than happy to take that risk knowing that even if Metcalf’s floor is a split end deep threat who can out-muscle, out-leap, and out-run corners, they would have a weapon well-suited to work with the best deep ball passer in the NFL.

Metcalf also has clear contributions for those of us who still value the running game. Seattle asks their receivers to run block, and Metcalf could be dominant in that aspect of the position. Carroll touched on this in the press conference, specifically calling out the role Metcalf could play in the play action passing attack Seattle likes to feature and Russell Wilson excels at executing.

The floor for Metcalf seems like Ricardo Lockette. The ceiling is much, much higher. Don’t jump down my throat, but Metcalf’s best self may share some similarities to Calvin Johnson. He is one inch shorter, 10 pounds lighter, but has longer arms, a similar 40 time and vertical leap, and near Johnson’s broad jump. Johnson was a once-in-a-lifetime athlete who was capable of things Metcalf likely will never achieve. Johnson, though, made a significant portion of his living posting up corners deep down field and in the red zone. Metcalf could absolutely mimic that portion of his game.

Cody Barton – Linebacker

Schneider traded up to get Metcalf using the 77th and 118th picks that were obtained through the series of trades emanating from the 21st pick. They traded up again in the third round to move from 92 to 88 to select Cody Barton. None of the picks in that trade were related to the 21st pick trade tree.

Barton is a player most analysts had rated lower than the third round. He is an active and sure tackler, and can play all three linebacker spots. Carroll said he will start in the middle.

There is a (very) small part of me that wonders if the Seahawks were hedging against the possibility of letting Bobby Wagner walk next year and taking whatever comp pick they would receiver as a result. That seems very unlikely, but Barton seems best suited to be a wide-ranging middle linebacker.

Seattle has a couple of question marks at outside linebacker with K.J. Wright yet to prove he is able to play a full season of late and Mychal Kendricks facing an uncertain future for legal reasons. Most likely, Barton will serve as the Brock Coyle role of backing up at middle linebacker, available to step in at the other positions and ace special teams player.

Both Metcalf and Barton could be excellent special teams additions.

Schneider has not selected a linebacker this high since Wagner in the second round of the 2012 draft. In fact, Wagner was the only linebacker selected before round four through all of Schneider’s drafts. That indicates the team sees something special in him.

The Coyle compare establishes his floor, but Barton could become an answer at starting weakside linebacker or middle as soon as next season.

Seahawks Remaining Picks

Round 4: 114th overall

Round 4: 124th overall

Round 4: 132nd overall

Round 5: 142nd overall

Round 6: 209th overall

Round 7: None

Seattle heads into the final day of the draft with five picks remaining. It would not surprise me to see Schneider trade down one or two more times to accumulate some 7th round picks. Keep on eye on the Bengals who have a whopping five picks in the 7th round.

7 Responses

  1. Noah Shirley

    I like this draft so far, addressing our needs. Also, I think that John Schneider did a really good job turning Frank Clark into a bunch of draft picks including someone who I think is going to do very well this year in D.K Metcalf. Once again I applaud Schneider for a really good draft this year

    Reply
  2. Darrell

    Another way to look at it, Schneider opened a hole at DE (Frank Clark trade) but mitigated the loss partially by adding LJ and significantly shoring up issues at the SS and WR depth. And each of these 3 salaries are less than a quarter of what Clark would have cost as a franchise tagged player.

    If Rasheem Green takes a big step forward this year (and that is a big ‘IF’,) then we will have a decent DL still.

    Other than offensive linemen (which I really blame Tom Cable for,) the Seahawks are at the top of the league for drafting quality! (Ours was second to only Indy’s awesome draft group.)

    Reply
  3. Rowdy Yates

    Trading #114 to Vikes and watching them use it on OG Dru Samia, felt like a blunder. Especially for a run-centric, lets-get-tougher team.
    Go Hawks.

    Reply
  4. Christine Hansen

    I notice Uncle Bob’s absence. Miss his comments. Any ideas?

    Reply
    • Uncle Bob

      Way to put pressure on the ol’ man there, but thanks very much for the concern/interest. I’ll try not to disappoint.

      I too felt a bit disappointed in the day one trade down returns, but did like the Collier pick (one of the big plusses you heard on Bosa was how advanced his hand usage is………that’s also a strong suit for Collier, just not noted as consistently). But one of the frequently done things is the anointing of a “winner” of the draft. Don’t recall there’s a Lombardi trophy for that. Now that the draft is over JS is getting his just recognition. Though this article is focused on day 2 I feel very good about the overall draft. Special teams should get much better if the coaching is up to the challenge. Wide receiver looks to have plenty of options if Russ will have confidence in any of these guys (a point that would benefit from detail discussion). I felt, counter to most pre-draft prognosticators, that linebacker needed attention, so I’m happy there. Not much for preidentified corners, but an intriguing group of safety prospects for Pete to play with. Even some hopeful (as in not el sucko mucho) O line talent. Hopefully Dissly will pull a Graham like recovery (though that kind of heroic is uncommon with a patellar) as there just wasn’t enough selection to go around at TE. There never is a perfect draft, but this one has some very good potential.

      Of course the loudest lamentation is “we didn’t get an impact pass rusher…..”. True dat. And Pete has indicated there’s possibly some more solutions to come. That, of course, cranks up the speculation machine again. Hi on the list is the name Clowney. Understandable, but for me, not likely……although I’ve been wrong many times about stuff like that. Some will say, “if you’re going to do that why didn’t you just keep Clark?” Not an unreasonable question, but short sighted. The wheelin’ and dealin’ that yielded a good draft wouldn’t have happened without the flexibility that the 29th pick allowed. And, my hope is, that PC/JS have learned from the Harvin and Graham mistakes. I.E., avoid the silver bullet approach. Neither of those guys were talent evaluation mistakes, they were roster fit errors (and Harvin was a nut job cancer while Graham was a model team mate). My concern would be that Clowney too would cost more than he ultimately gives in return. He’d likely give a lot, but not for what he’d cost. We’ll see.

      So, what’s the answer for a pass rushing stud? Mine would be to suggest, stop thinking that way. I’ll use Graham as an example again. Last year when he left in FA a frequent an loud lament was “oh no, how are we going to replace his 10 touch downs?” Well, they did that just fine by spreading the “wealth” among a number of players that ended up with a higher total TD count for the season. They also made the playoffs which they didn’t the year before. Therein lies the secret that seems to evade human beings on a regular basis. Love ’em or hate ’em the Patriots are serious contenders every year. “Star” players come and go, but the juggernaut keeps rolling. It’s sometimes referred to as “the Patriot way”. If we know it exists, why doesn’t everyone do it that way? Good question. Seems simple enough, but it’s hard. The best way is to paraphrase something Belichick preaches to those who would be mindful. Don’t focus on what the player can’t do, focus on what they do best. Examples? So and so safety is not as good a Earl Thomas, woe is us. Another; we didn’t get an edge rusher to replace 13 sacks (btw, the Patriots got the Lombardi, check out their sack standings). There are hundreds more examples, but you probably get the point by now that it’s about getting the most out of what you’ve got rather than lamenting what ya don’t got. Hint; all the “experts” were predicting how bad the Seahawks were going to be for the ’18 season at this time last year. Yet there they were, in the playoffs (though not for long, sigh). The Silver Bullet crowd would probably say it was because of RW. He was definitely important, but teamwork is much more important…….especially in football with 22 bodies on the field for each play.

      To my thinking that’s why I’m optimistic about the draft outcome this year. While it’s slight, I feel like there’s a shift in philosophy exhibited by PC/JS. They describe it as looking for intensity, leadership, i.e. DOGS. We don’t necessarily need a two digit sack guy to replace Frank, 4 guys with 4 sacks each wouldn’t be all bad if you’re going to focus on just that one objective. I’d rather see more hurries, TFLs, and turnovers, but all of those are important…….and hard to predict at this juncture. Let’s enjoy the moment and look forward with optimism. We might fool the “experts” again this season as well. Wouldn’t it be sweeter to do it with a “pedestrian” squad?

      Reply
      • Christine Hansen

        Glad you are back, Uncle Bob! I do enjoy your thoughtful replies that are at times, poetic.
        And I refer to us ol’ people as those who have many, many years of experience.
        Already this is a very exciting season.

  5. Rowdy Yates

    Got a good feeling about John Ursua. Hawk’s version of Mr. Irrelevant this year. (I seem to be a sucker for trade-ups). Also,T. Homer @ RB. I’d go to the race track, but it’s closed. Lucky me.

    Metcalf is truly exciting, doi. Boom or bust, but such a boom. Frank Clark was at the bottom of 2nd round, too. Of course, that means nothing, unless you’re in race track mode.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

", source:"wp" });