The Morning After: Seahawks Not Good Enough Without MVP QB, Fall 30-16 to Ravens
Offense
Defense
Special Teams
1.8Game Rating
Reader Rating: (13 Votes)

There will be detailed breakdowns of specific decisions, picking apart of certain play calls, anger about a weak pass rush, but the reason the Seahawks lost to the Ravens was very simple: Russell Wilson did not play at an MVP level. There will be those who rage at that comment and blame it on Pete Carroll or the defense. They are free to do so. This team is simply not good enough in other phases to beat quality opponents unless Wilson is playing his best football. He was not close to his best on Sunday.

If you want to broaden the story, you can say that the Seahawks offense has to be great for the Seahawks to win. They are far and away the strongest unit on this team. They scored 16 points and gave up 14 points versus the Ravens. The chances of Seattle winning a game like that are slim-to-none.

People can marvel at Lamar Jackson—and he is a fantastic runner—but the Ravens offense scored 16 points and had fewer total yards (340) than the Seahawks (347).

The defense played a pretty decent game. Most of the Ravens yardage came on off-script scrambles by Jackson. There was the one deep pass where Tedric Thompson once again showed his lack of ball skills, and the one seam pass to the tight end over K.J. Wright.

Jackson was held to his fewest yards passing and their offense was held to its second-fewest yards and lowest point total on the season

No, this game was not on the Seahawks defense. It turned on the pick-six from Wilson. Seattle was ahead 10-6 and driving for more points. They were in control of the game to that point. Wilson very rarely makes mistakes that lead to interceptions, but when he does, it is that throw in the flat.

He did it in Chicago last year and against the Chargers. You will not find me destroying him for the play here. The guy has been nearly flawless this season and is the primary reason the team was 5-1 before Sunday.

What folks need to realize is that if gets the bulk of the credit for victories, he must also feel the weight of responsibility for losses like this one. Heavy is the head that holds the crown.

This team needs him to be great. If it had not been raining yesterday, he very well might have been. This marks just the latest example of Wilson struggling in the rain. He entered the season with an 85.6 passer rating, 8 interceptions, and 5 fumbles in eight career games where it rained at home. This game did not help his numbers, as he ended with a 65.2 rating and another pick.

Wilson completed less than half his passes. He was unable to push the ball downfield successfully as he ended with just 5.9 yards per attempt.

The running game did not help as Chris Carson was held to 65 yards on 21 carries, but that was to be expected. This Ravens run defense is stellar when interior lineman Brandon Williams plays, as he did yesterday. Four of the six Ravens opponents this season were held to under 80 yards rushing. Three of them were held under 40 yards rushing. Seattle had a respectable 106 yards on 26 carries for 4.1 yards per tote. That would have been a fine counter-punch to an effective passing attack, but they did not have one.

There were a few other problems that need to be pointed out. Brian Schottenheimer’s play call on 3rd and 2 when the game was tied at 13 was awful. Every yard on that drive had been earned on the ground to that point, much of it with Carson. Schottenheimer called a play without Carson on the field that involved Tyler Lockett in the backfield sprinting to the left flat for what was the least deceptive attempt at a deceptive play I can recall.

Everyone knew what was going to happen there, including the Ravens defense, who smothered Lockett for a loss.

That was then followed by a terrible decision by Carroll to kick a 53-yard field goal in poor weather conditions instead of going for it on 4th and 3 from the 35-yard line. That was followed by our supposedly good kicker missing said field goal. It was a tough kick, but how about doing something tough to earn your paycheck?

I have seen folks on Twitter contrasting Carroll choosing not to go for it with John Harbaugh choosing to go for it on the next drive. The problem with that comparison is Harbaugh had decided to kick the field goal as well. It was Jackson who pleaded with Harbaugh to change his mind and ultimately go for it. I don’t necessarily see that as a clear example of Carroll being out-coached.

As bad as that all was, those moments were not as pivotal as the pick-six earlier, and could have been overcome with better play by the offense.

There were a few positives to acknowledge.

Marquise Blair did a nice job in his first start. We can only hope the team considers keeping him in the starting lineup when Bradley McDougald returns. Carroll was measured in his analysis of Blair in the postgame, noting that Blair was out of position a few times. My guess is Blair is headstrong and resisting coaching. Carroll’s one area of leverage to force Blair to listen is playing time. That hidden battle could be keeping Blair from getting the snaps he needs.

Blame that on Carroll. Blame it on Blair. Either way, let’s figure it out and get Thompson off the field.

The offensive line did a nice job. Wilson had a good pocket for much of the game and was sacked only one time. It was great to see D.J. Fluker active but Jamarco Jones starting. That is a pretty good indicator Jones will stay in the lineup going forward.

The next test will be what happens when Duane Brown returns to health. Is there any chance Germain Ifedi faces true competition finally? Let’s hope so.

Seattle now turns to the Falcons in Atlanta in a game they must win if they hope to have any chance of competing for the division title. There are not many weak teams left on the schedule, and the 1-6 Falcons certainly qualify. Wilson playing indoors in a dome on the turf against a porous defense should be just what the doctor ordered.

About The Author

Founder, Editor & Lead Writer

Related Posts

3 Responses

  1. Scott Crowder

    Disappointing loss. One we should have won. We’ve won a couple where it felt like we stole them. Well, yesterday we robbed ourselves.
    Wilson and rain don’t mix. I wonder what it is? It surely doesn’t bode well for playoff games where it is almost guaranteed it’s raining in Seattle, that time of year.
    It’s ironic our HOF QB can’t throw worth crap in the rain in Seattle.

    Reply
    • Mark Dewees

      This felt very much like the Saints game. Bad weather, big mistakes and poor coaching. If we had to lose a game this is a better game since at least it is out of conference but with the way the Niners are playing their is very little margin for error. Even the Rams showed they are still here by thinking Atlanta.

      Reply
  2. Uncle Bob

    I’m going to be lazy this week and just cut and paste the comments I made last night on Staton’s blog. Jeff Simmons made a very good observation about the Browns weakness that applies to the Seahawks in a similar while different way. He said (paraphrasing), the Browns have a group of big talents but they’re not a team. The people charged with molding a team are the coaches not the players. The Seahawks haven’t got quite the talent level across the board, but poor preparation for what an opponent typically does (primarily a coaching issue) is a problem.

    Unfortunately this game was effectively over when the Hawks came out weak in the second half. The offense didn’t get the job done and the defense ended up on the field so long that by the fourth quarter they were largely out of gas. Yeah, we’ll do the usual fan things and point to this play or that, this player or that, but it’s systemic. Between youth and ability this is a mid level team, should not have been ranked in the top ten. Going forward they’ll be okay/competitive against genuine lower 10 ranked teams, even up on the others that are middlin’ like them, and handled by the legitimate top 10. They are who some of us thought they were, RWs play not withstanding.

    As fans we tend to focus on player talent and short sell coaching for the most part. Schotty and his guys seem to be growing into their jobs gradually and might be able to figure out how to coach up the talent they have available for now as time progresses. I don’t have the same belief on the D side of things. Again, there’s some decent talent there but from the DC on down through the position ranks we have middlin’ coaching that get middlin’ results. Norton was passed over when Quinn left for a reason(s), and didn’t show much at Oakland (though Del Rio might have been part of that too). Richard may have been promoted to his level of incompetence too as DC, but when he was the DB coach he was in his element. Norton might still be good if he were only responsible for the LBs. It’s the coaches that break down the opposition video, it’s the coaches who scheme for that team, and it’s the coaches that call which players are on the field for which probable offensive alignments and call in the plays to Bobby. That’s a lot of responsibility that doesn’t fall on the players. Yeah, the players have to have the football IQ and physical skills to execute, but they aren’t the whole problem as many will want to lay on them.

    Maybe now, going forward, we can view this team as what they are. A fairly good team that can be entertaining at times. but not playoff contenders (they might slide in as a WC, but won’t advance).

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

", source:"wp" });