Tuesday, October 8, 2013

Hawk Blogger 2013 Power Rankings: Week 5

THIS WEEK
The rankings are starting to solidify. The loss of Jake Locker last week could drive the Titans further downward, giving a team like Cincinnati, Green Bay, or another team to climb into the top ten. The rest of the teams at the top appear likely to remain. Both Denver and Seattle took a big fall from their lofty perches. The Broncos walked away with a win, but also allowed 48 points. The formula does not factor in game outcome. It is about the underlying indicators of how efficient the team is.

Surprises outside the top ten include Baltimore at #27, Cleveland at #11, and Carolina at #13.

Note: If you are having problems viewing the rankings below, try this link.(FIXED! LINK WILL WORK!)



Scatter chart of the rankings. This view helps to give you a view of how teams are grouped together. You will generally see tiers of strength develop as the season wears on.



RANKINGS EXPLAINED
Power rankings are always debatable. I don't buy into the gut feel methods most places use to determine their rankings, so I developed a formula a few years back that attempts to take at least some of the subjectivity out of the discussion. My approach was simple, I measured offensive and defensive efficiency based on the Yards Per Carry (YPC) and Yards Per Attempt (YPA), as well as points scored and points allowed. The formula to calculate "Team Strength" was as follows:

(YPC (offense) + YPA (offense) + Avg Pts/Game Scored) - (YPC (defense) + YPA (defense)+ Avg Pts/Game Allowed)


The formula has proven to be a pretty accurate predictor of success, but I am always looking for ways to improve it. I read a great article on ColdHardFootballFacts.com. There was one gem in there about predicting championship teams. The article mentioned passer rating differential as the "mother of all stats." A full 69 of 72 champions have ranked in the Top 10 in this statistic. It is a stat after my own heart, as I believe offensive and defensive efficiency is the key measurable outside of point differential. Turnovers would factor in there as well, but I am not convinced a team has as much control over that. My power rankings use YPA and YPC differentials. I went ahead and replaced the YPA with offensive and defensive passer rating, to give me this:

(YPC (offense) + Passer Rating (offense) + Avg Pts/Game Scored) - (OPP YPC (defense) + OPP Passer Rating (defense)+ OPP Avg Pts/Game)


No comments :