Seahawks Stats at the Three-Quarter Mark

And down the stretch they come… Twelve games into the 2016 season, and the Seahawks have penned a tale remarkably similar to their previous installments. Wobble early. Accelerate late. One might come to the conclusion that rope-a-dope is an intentional strategy employed by Pete Carroll and staff. Not quite. A significant aspect of his philosophy is to tolerate uncertainty and imperfection early in order to adjust and grow into an unstoppable force late. He would gladly win every game, early or late, but he would never be afraid to take lumps early if he was convinced it would allow them to finish the season as a better team. Carroll’s approach is more like The Borg. Initial attacks may work against him, but he is constantly assimilating new information, adjusting, and becoming more difficult to defeat. As we examine a few stats that stand out three-quarters of the way through the season, the evidence of Carroll’s adjustments is clear. Seattle is becoming harder to beat. Resistance may ultimately be futile.


Running game returns

The most bitter reality for the first half of the season was that the Seahawks could not run the ball. They were almost hopeless. Ranked 30th out of 32 teams in rushing yards and yards per carry just four games ago, the team has broken out the past four games to produce a far more familiar balance to their offense. In fact, over the past six games, the Seahawks lead the NFL in yards per carry at 5.31. Over the past four games, the Seahawks are second in the NFL in rushing yards and first in yards per carry.



This was arguably the Seahawks greatest weakness throughout the season. Most people agonize over the Seahawks pass blocking, but you can be sure that Tom Cable was fixated on the line’s ability to run block. It takes time to coordinate and create a rhythm across both linemen and runner. The return to health of Russell Wilson is a huge part of the rise, as he has 134 yards rushing (6.1 YPC) the past four games after having just 54 yards (1.9 YPC) in his first eight. Still, he only accounts for 22% of the team’s rushing yards since game number nine.

Thomas Rawls and C.J. Prosise were equally big stories. Rawls played in only three of the four games and had 201 yards while averaging 4.9 yards per run. Prosise exploded onto the scene and was averaging 6.8 yards per run before succumbing to injury against Philadelphia. His return would be a big boost come playoff time. Games remain against the stout Arizona Cardinals and Los Angeles Rams. We will know just how much this run game can be counted on before the season ends.


Offense finding some footing

The cries of pain and suffering were heard near and far among Seahawks fans whenever the offense took the field for much of the season. Outside of a disconcerting return to bumbling and stumbling against Tampa Bay, the offense has shown signs of dominant life.



The Seahawks offense ranked third in total yards over the past four games and fifth in yards per play.


That Seattle was able to average 26 ppg and 410 ypg despite having a Tampa game where they scored 5 points had 245 yards demonstrates just how good they have been elsewhere. Take out that Tampa game, and the Seahawks averaged 32 ppg and 464 ypg against New England, Philadelphia and Carolina. Not bad.


Explosive plays booming

If you had asked Carroll in a private setting what his biggest concerns were with the Seahawks offense, he would have told you it was the lack of balance in the run game and the absence of explosive plays. Wilson was struggling through injury. Tyler Lockett was as well. Playcalling was adjusted to make due. The results were unpleasant. Seattle averaged just 5.5 explosive plays on offense in the second quarter of the season. That was their lowest mark since averaging 4.3 explosive plays in the final quarter of the 2013 season. Things have turned around nicely since then, with a season high 13 explosive plays in their last game.


You can see the valley the team entered after the Jets game, where explosive passes nearly vanished. They returned in the Bills game, immediately after Carroll announced that “things will look different” following a frustrating loss to the Saints where the team played conservatively to protect Wilson, according to Carroll. The run game had been largely a non-factor when it came to explosive plays, which should come as no surprise given it was a non-factor in any type of play for most of the year.


The seven explosive rushing plays against Carolina (the top-ranked rush defense in yards per carry coming in) were the most by a Seahawks team since recording 10 explosive rushes against the New York Giants in 2014




The offense took off over the second half of the season last year. The charts above show how the offense this year is tracking against that record run. The passing game has generally been more explosive. The running game has lagged behind.




When you total things up, you see a Seahawks offense that is looking quite similar to what we saw last year at this time.


Penalties drop

I have written before about the penalty problems facing the Seahawks. Richard Sherman has been open about his perspective regarding the tough calls that seem to go against Seattle. Somewhat silently, penalties against the Seahawks have receded over the past four weeks.


One might think it was because habitual line-stepper Michael Bennett has been out and unable to jump offsides, but that did not help the team avoid 11 penalties against the Saints or 10 penalties against the Bills. Seattle committed just six penalties for 37 yards in this last game against the Panthers even with Bennett performing his perfunctory offsides in his return to action. It may be a momentary glitch in the otherwise flag-ridden Seahawks reality, or it may be another sign of growth among young players.

One thing that has to stop is veteran Bradley Sowell’s false starts. He has done it four times this year even while missing a number of games. That ranks fifth in the NFL. He had two in the last home game. False starts, in general, are the biggest penalty issue for the Seahawks. They rank fifth in the league in false starts with 19 on the year, per Those are negative plays the offense can almost completely eliminate with discipline.


Struggling in situational efficiency

One important metric that is trending the wrong way for the Seahawks is their ability to convert pivotal situations and keep their opponents from doing the same. Early in the season, the Seahawks were leading the NFL in third down defense. No longer. They rank near the bottom of the league. Similarly, their red zone efficiency on offense was healthy, but has become sickly of late.


A positive differential between you and your opponent in situational football is often the difference between winning and losing. Inefficiency in these moments indicates sloppier play and can sometimes indicate a lack of focus or communication.

By comparison, the red-hot Seahawks offense during the second half of last season converted 56% of their 3rd downs (compared to 37% over these last four games) and 69% of their red zone chances (versus 38% in these last four). This is perhaps the most important area left for the coaches and players to refine before heading into the postseason. They must have supreme confidence in their ability to execute in these moments to maximize their potential this year.


Summary trends




Founder, Editor & Lead Writer
  1. Half time commentary: situational efficiency might be too predictive.
    Instead of Terrell being the weak link, it seems Rodgers is feasting on Shead, with Lane as an appetizer. RW can’t hit his own butt with either hand. O-line isn’t awful (well, Sowell maybe) but can’t seem to hold blocks long enough. Refs seem to be calling it loose for both teams, but shouldn’t let a facemask like on Lockett get by. But sadly, the Hawks are beating themselves so far. C’mon guys, ball out in the second half…………

    1. If you only looked at part of the box score you’d think this was the close game we expected…………….except for red zone efficiency of 0%, goal to go efficiency of 0%. GB was 100 on both.

      Pretty timely data Brian. I wonder how many pins Fisher has put in his Hawk voodoo doll for Thursday night……..

  2. OUCH! that’s 3 big wins then 1stinker 1big win then this perfect storm of misfortune. Bennett Avril Morgan Terrell O Line WRs Russ will all be much better after next 5 weeks in west coast. we will still get 2nd seed as Lions Bucs hav tough schedule. we hav averaged 50% less points in road games, Russ is up & down due to legacy of 3 big injuries, long haul flights inhibit healing significantly. we can still win SB51. If Russ Britt Rawls Prosise Jimmy & DL stay healthy as Dallas DL is weak & rookies Dak Zeke will falter in intense heat of NFC champ game.

    1. it was a little scary how easy it was for rodgers, he was effortlessly taking the D apart in the 1st half, the only thing that stopped him was mc carthy trying to get the running game going. a stat that popped up last night was the travel, i believe we travel over 27,000 km this season, compare that with steeles @ 20% that, throw in the time zones and it becomes very excusable to throw in these stinkers away from home. we need that no.2 and the bye. we’re fortunate to have such a week division whilst detroit you imagine will lose 1 of 3 at least. i thought lane was weak last night, that said with no pressure on rodgers he makes anybody look weak

  3. This comment is related to SEAHAWKS identity – our running game.Team has 2 very good Change of Pace backs but in my humble opion Hawks in dire need of that big every down back…Teams with little needs some times can be a bit more assertive in Draft. In this I am referring to packaging draft picks 1,2,3 maybe even adding the 4th pick to Move UP in draft order to get that Special player…Last draft I was wishing for the Seahawks to package their selections to move uo, to Get that player who could return them to their identity which is running the ball, sustaining 3rd downs and especially in the 3rd and 4th quarters like they had with Lynch. Thus I wanted them to move up and get Elliotin 2016 draft. My point being, if that every down, special back is up in the first round why the heck not move up and Get your guy ?Sure the ) line has issues butthat will work itself out. LSU and TEXAS both have some big talented backs in 2017 draft….trade up and snatch one 😉 Or get a veteran like you did with Lynch (Blount came to my mind – he was bounced around for a bit but the hawks didn’t check him out?)….

Comments are closed.